Fitness Trainer Course - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 630 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/05/15 Category Sports Essay Level High school Tags: Fitness Essay Did you like this example? The two types of training I am going to discuss today are aerobic, and anaerobic. It is important to know the difference between these two types of training.The first type isaerobic whichoccurswith the use of oxygen, or requiring oxygen (Hatfield, 2018, p. 108). The second one is anaerobic which is the opposite of aerobic and it occurs without the use of oxygen (Hatfield, 2018, p. 109). When you are performing an exercise it is either aerobic, or anaerobic training your body is experiencing. Your cardiovascular system is at work during aerobic exercises as this typically involvesexercises on atreadmill, stepper, or a bike (Hatfield, 2018, p. 108). When you are at a steady pace the slow twitch muscle fibers in the bodycome into play during the aerobic exercises. This is a contrast to the response to anaerobic training as this type of training greatly increases the bodys functional capacity for development of explosive strength and maximization of short-term energy systems ( Hatfield, 2018, p. 109). This is when the fast twitch muscle fibers come into play. The heart rate during these two types of training have similarities as they both average fora conditioned person of 60 bpm or less (Hatfield, 2018, p. 49). If you fall into the deconditioned category with no exercise you may havea resting heart rate of about 80 bpm or more (Hatfield, 2018, p. 49). The adaptations the body undergoes over time for aerobic training include an increase in the size and number of mitochondria and greater myoglobin content, the aerobic capacity of the muscle tissue is then enhanced (Hatfield, 2018, p. 108). So when this occurs the muscles fibers are able to boost the fat burning capabilities (Hatfield, 2018, p. 108). When you look at the adaptations of anaerobic exercises you can see how the fast-twitch muscle fibers begin to grow in their size and an increased tolerance to higher levels of blood lactate, increase in enzymes of glucose breakdown and an increase in muscle resting levels of ATP, CP, creatine, and glycogen content (Hatfield, 2018, p. 109). As a future personal trainer it will be important to have an understanding of aerobic, and anaerobic training for my clients. I will help educate them on the differences andutilize the formula that is presented on page 49 of the text between a conditioned person, and a deconditioned person. This helped me get a more accurate idea of where I was when I started my training years ago as it made me see the extra work my heart was beating as a deconditioned person. I will help my clients see that the two types of training go more hand and hand as you can incorporate exercises that fulfill both types and get the results you desire. I will explain the health benefits of how your cardiovascular system is strengthened with these training types. Aerobic exercises can help relieve stress, lower the risk of heart disease, slow the aging process, improve the quality of sleep, and improve mental sharpness (Hat field, 2018, p. 304). I will also educate my clients on the effects of overtraining and how you must listen to your body when you are exercising. My trainer I had would make me stop even when I wanted to keep on going as she felt that I was pushing myself way too hard during anaerobic strength training. I was pushing a sled with a lot of weight on it, and my foot slipped at one point. I wanted to keep going, but my trainer could see that I was exhausted and I wasnt listening to my body. So it is important to listen to your trainer as we are the ones who are supposed to look for signs like this to help keep our clients accountable as well. I found it was so easy to focus while in the training zone that I would ignore the fatigue I was feeling. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Fitness Trainer Course" essay for you Create order

Rogerian Argument Definition and Examples

Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as  Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening. Whereas traditional argument focuses on winning, the Rogerian model seeks a mutually satisfactory solution. The Rogerian model of argument was adapted from the work of American psychologist Carl Rogers by the composition scholars Richard Young, Alton Becker, and Kenneth Pike in their textbook Rhetoric: Discovery and Change (1970). Aims of Rogerian Argument The authors of Rhetoric: Discovery and Change explain the process this way: The writer who uses the Rogerian strategy attempts to do three things: (1) to convey to the reader that he is understood, (2) to delineate the area within which he believes the readers position to be valid, and (3) to induce him to believe that he and the writer share similar moral qualities (honesty, integrity, and good will) and aspirations (the desire to discover a mutually acceptable solution). We stress here that these are only tasks, not stages of the argument. Rogerian argument has no conventional structure; in fact, users of the strategy deliberately avoid conventional persuasive structures and techniques because these devices tend to produce a sense of threat, precisely what the writer seeks to overcome.... The goal of Rogerian argument is to create a situation conducive to cooperation; this may well involve changes in Format of Rogerian Argument. When presenting your case and the case of the other side, the style is flexible with how you set up your information and how long you spend on each section. But you do want to be balanced—spending an inordinate amount of time on your position and only giving lip service to the other side, for example, defeats the purpose of using the Rogerian style. The ideal format of a written Rogerian persuasion looks something like this (Richard M. Coe, Form and Substance: An Advanced Rhetoric. Wiley, 1981): Introduction: Present the topic as a problem to solve together, rather than an issue.Opposing position: State the opinion of your opposition in an objective manner thats fair and accurate, so the other side knows that you understand its position.Context for the opposing position: Show the opposition that you understand under what circumstances its position is valid.Your position: Present your position objectively. Yes, you want to be convincing, but you want the opposition to see it with clarity and fairly as well, just as you presented its position earlier.Context for your position: Show the opposition contexts in which your position is also valid.Benefits: Appeal to the opposition and show how elements of your position could work to benefit its interests. You use one type of rhetoric when discussing your position with people who already agree with you. To discuss your position with the opposition, you need to tone that down and break it into objective elements, so the sides can more easily see areas of common ground. Taking the time to state the opposing sides arguments and contexts means the opposition has less reason to get defensive and stop listening to your ideas. Feminist Responses to Rogerian Argument In the 1970s and into the early 1990s, some debate existed about whether women should use this conflict-solving technique. Feminists are divided on the method: some see Rogerian argument as feminist and beneficial because it appears less antagonistic than traditional Aristotelian argument. Others argue that when used by women, this type of argument reinforces the feminine stereotype, since historically women are viewed as nonconfrontational and understanding (see especially Catherine E. Lambs 1991 article Beyond Argument in Freshman Composition and Phyllis Lassners 1990 article Feminist Responses to Rogerian Argument). (Edith H. Babin and Kimberly Harrison, Contemporary Composition Studies: A Guide to Theorists and Terms. Greenwood, 1999)

Pepsi vs. Coca Cola Free Essays

As a result, the company has no difficulty in borrowing money since creditors prefer lending money to liquid firms. Long Term Solvency * The total debt ratio has decreased by 12. 863% because total assets have increased more than total debt. We will write a custom essay sample on Pepsi vs. Coca Cola or any similar topic only for you Order Now * The debt-equity ratio has decreased by 31. 25% since the company’s total equity has increased. * The Equity Multiplier has decreased by 20. 202% as a result of the increase in total assets. * Overall, the company has become less solvent, and its leverage has decreased as a result of the increase in total assets and equity.In this regard, the company is in a good position and can pay off its long-term debt as it becomes due. Asset Management * The inventory turnover has decreased by 4. 839% because the inventory increased and the cost of goods sold decreased. * The day’s sales in inventory have increased by 5. 080 % since the inventory turnover rate has decreased. This is an indicator that extra inventory is lying around and that more unnecessary expenses may occur. * The receivable turnover ratio has increased by 1. 192% because of the decrease in sales and the decrease in account receivable.The company collected more sales in 2009 than in the previous year. * Therefore, in order to further improve Pepsi’s management of assets, the company can increase its sales, thereby increasing its receivables turnover, as well as minimize the cost of goods sold. Profitability * The company’s profit margin has increased by 18. 182% due to the increase in net income and the decrease in sales. * Return on assets has also increased by 7. 143% due to the increase in total assets being larger than the increase in net income. * The 16. 67% decrease in the company’s return on equity was caused by the rise of total equity which was larger than the increase in net income. * Overall, the company has increasing in profitability due to increased sales and thus higher revenue. However, equity increased more than net income, resulting in a negative ROE between 2008 and 2009 Valuation * The earnings per share have increased by 17. 445%, meaning that the market value of the stock has increased between 2008 and 2009. * The price earnings ratio has dropped by 5. 510%, meaning that investors in 2009 were willing to pay slightly less per dollar of earnings than in 2008. The price sales ratio has increased slightly by 0. 8% between 2008 and 2009, meaning that the Pepsi’s stock has improved slightly based on its own past performance. * Overall, despite the drop in price earnings ratio, Pepsi has increased the value of its stock. By increasing investor incentives and demand, Pepsi can also regain positive numbers in its future price earnings ratios Part Two: Coca Cola Coca Cola was chosen as the benchmark company because not only is it categorized within the same food and beverage industry segment as Pepsi, it is also a leading company in this industry. Ratio Analysis: Coca Cola COCA COLA RATIOS:| | 2009| 2008| Percent Change (%)| Liquidity| Current Ratio| 1. 27| 0. 93| 36. 559| | Cash Ratio| 0. 67| 0. 38| 76. 316| | NWC to Total Assets| 0. 078| -0. 02| -490. 000| | | | | | Solvency| Total Debt Ratio | 0. 490477| 0. 494756| -0. 865| | Debt Equity Ratio| 0. 092| 0. 135| -31. 852| | Equity Multiplier| 1. 96| 1. 97| -0. 508| | | | | | Asset Management| Inventory turnover| 4. 71| 5. 2| -9. 423| | Days’ Sales in Inventory| 77. 49| 70. 19| 10. 400| | Receivables Turnover| 8. 24| 10. 33| -20. 232| | | | | |Profitability| Profit Margin (PM)| 0. 22| 0. 18| 22. 222| | Return on Assets (ROA)| 0. 14| 0. 143| -2. 098| | Return on Equity (ROE)| 0. 27| 0. 28| -3. 571| | | | | | Valuation| Earnings Per Share (EPS)| 2. 95| 2. 51| 17. 530| | Price-Earnings (PE) Ratio| 19. 32| 24. 30| -20. 494| | Price-Sales Ratio| 4. 85725| 4. 729334| 2. 705| Short Term Liquidity * The current ratio increased by about 36. 5% because the increase in current assets is significantly larger than the increase in current liabilities. * The NWC to total assets has increased as a result of the increase in total assets. The cash ratio has increased in 2009 by 76. 316% since the increase in cash was larger than the increase in current liabilities. * The increase in cash and current assets has rendered the company more liquid. Similar to Pepsi, Coca- Cola won’t face difficulties in borrowing money as high liquidity is an attribute creditors analyze when lending to firms. Long Term Solvency * The total debt ratio decreased by 0. 865% because of an increase in total assets. * The debt-equity ratio has declined by 31. 852% as a result of the increase in total equity and the increase in total debt. The company’s equity multiplier has decreased by 0. 508% due to the increase in total assets accompanied with a smaller increase in total equity. * Overall, the company has become less solvent because its total equity and total assets have increased. * Improving the solvency of the company would involve increasing its debt by taking out more loans and increasing the company’s assets through the purchase of capital or an increase in sales. Asset Management * The company’s inventory turnover rate decreased by 9. 423% since the cost of goods sold has decreased and the inventory increased.Inventory was transferred into sales less rapidly in 2009 than in the previous year. * Days’ sales in inventory for the firm increased by 10. 4% because inventory turnover rate has increased. Although there was a rise in the days’ sales in inventory, the increase is smaller than that of Pepsi. Therefore Pepsi was selling more inventory than Coca Cola. * The receivables turnover rate has decreased by 20. 232% because of the increase in accounts receivable and the decrease in sales. Therefore, with a lower receivables turnover, the company is not operating as effectively as the previous year. The ratios show that the company did not improve its asset management; thus, Coca Cola could further enhance its asset management by increasing sales. Profitability * Coca Cola’s profit margin increased by about 22. 2% because of the decline in sales and the increase in net income. * The company’s return on assets (ROA) fell by 2. 098% since the increase in total assets was greater than the increase in net income. * The return on equity (ROE) of the firm has declined by 3. 571% due to the increase in total equity which was greater than the increase in net income. * The company, therefore, has shown an increase in profitability.This was caused primarily by the rise in net income. By increasing sales, the company can increase its revenues and, accordingly, raise its net income. Valuation * Earnings per share increased by 17. 53% meaning that Coca Cola was selling shares for 0. 44$ more in 2009 than in 2008. Thus, Coca Cola has increased the value of its shares. * The Price Earnings Ratio has decreased by about 20. 5% since the market value has dropped somewhat between 2008 and 2009. * The price sales ratio has increased by about 2. 7%, this means that investors are expecting relatively higher growth from Coca Cola in the future because the 2. % increase indicates that Coca Cola is doing relatively better compared to its past performance. * Coca Cola has shown an increase in earnings per share and price sales ratio, despite a drop in the price earnings ratio, by increasing sales and stimulating consumer and investor demand, Coca Cola can continue to increase all three. Part Three: Recommendations and Comparison between Pepsi and Coca Cola Since 2008, both Pepsi and Coca Cola have increased their overall liquidity; neither firm will face any significant issues if they should need to borrow in the future, as liquidity is a major factor considered by lenders. Both Coca Cola and Pepsi have become less solvent; this was due to the increase in total assets and equity, without a similar increase in liabilities. This decrease in solvency is on the one hand a benefit, as it means the companies are both able to pay off debts as they come due, however, low solvency can also be an issue as it indicates low financial leverage. A way to mitigate this problem would be for both firms to acquire more debt, thereby increasing liabilities and thus increasing solvency. In terms of asset management, Pepsi did slightly better than Coca Cola between 2008 and 2009.While Coca Cola was unable to increase sales relative to its increasing accounts receivables, Pepsi, on the other hand, was still able to keep its receivables turnover slightly increasing between 2008 and 2009. Both Pepsi and Coca Cola saw profitability increase between 2008 and 2009, however, return on equity for both companies decreased during the year because equity increased and a disproportiona te rate compared to net income. To remedy this, both companies could be less apt to increase equity at such a high rate compared to net income. In terms of market value, both Pepsi and Coca Cola had overall increases in their share value. However, both companies endured decreases in their price earnings ratio (Coca Cola almost five times less than that of Pepsi), meaning that investors, between 2008 and 2009 were willing to invest less per share in both companies. Overall, between 2008 and 2009, despite enduring similar trends, Pepsi fared slightly better in terms of asset management, profitability and market value in comparison to Coca Cola’s performance References: Google Finance Investopedia. com Moneycentral. msn. com How to cite Pepsi vs. Coca Cola, Papers

The Effect of Cyber Society on Personal Relationships free essay sample

As more people opt for on-line relationships, they may find it more difficult to conduct face-to-face relationships. This paper explains how the Information Highway will affect the society in a manner that cannot yet be imagined and instead of a means of uniting the world the author feels that the technological revolution is creating a divide within society furthering social stratification and changing the dynamics of interpersonal relationships. From the paper: As the communications revolution reaches its climax the society is increasingly becoming virtual. Millions of Internet users are logging one every day and interacting with each other over the Internet. Where once socialization was limited within borders today, the society is increasingly becoming borderless as the Internet creates a global world. Chat systems like MSN and AOL Messenger, ICQ and MIRC have captured the peoples imagination and no longer is there a need to have personal face-to-face meetings. The interactive softwares allow a user to have web conferences, meetings and chat with more than one person at a time. We will write a custom essay sample on The Effect of Cyber Society on Personal Relationships or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Society is becoming impersonal as concepts like cyber love and cyber world emerge.